🎉
Getting too many applicants? Try Truffle's AI-powered one-way interviews for free here!
🎉
Exciting news! We just launched 50+ new integrations!
🎉
Exciting news! We just launched 50+ new integrations!
🎉
Getting too many applicants? Try Truffle's one-way interviews for free here!
Candidate screening & interviews

How to choose between using one way interviews after reviewing resumes or right after submission

One way interviews can save hours; but only if you use them at the right stage. We break down whether to trigger them after resume review or immediately post-application, with clear examples of when each approach works best.
Published on:
August 19, 2025
Updated on:
August 19, 2025

One way interviews have become a staple in modern hiring. They give candidates the chance to answer structured questions on their own time, and they give hiring teams a fast, consistent way to evaluate responses. But there’s a strategic question every team faces when adopting them: should you invite candidates to a one way interview only after you’ve reviewed their resume, or should you ask them to complete one immediately after submitting their application?

Both approaches work, but they solve different problems. Choosing the right one depends on your hiring volume, team capacity, and the type of roles you’re filling.

Why timing matters

One way interviews can happen at two points in the funnel:

  • Post-resume review: A recruiter screens resumes first, then selects candidates to move forward to a one way interview.
  • Post-submission: Every candidate who applies is invited to complete a one way interview automatically.

This choice shapes the candidate experience, the signal you get as a recruiter, and the efficiency of your process.

When to use one way interviews after reviewing resumes

This model fits teams that:

  • Have manageable applicant volume and can realistically review resumes before moving forward
  • Care about maintaining a human filter to avoid overwhelming candidates with interview tasks
  • Want to preserve a more traditional process where the interview feels like a second step rather than part of the application

The benefit is control. Recruiters can weed out clearly unqualified candidates before asking for more of their time. Candidates who make it to the one way interview stage often feel they’ve earned a shot, which can improve engagement.

The downside is speed. Reviewing resumes first adds friction, and top candidates might move on before you’ve had time to shortlist them.

Best for: specialized roles, lower applicant volume, or companies that emphasize high-touch recruiting.

When to use one way interviews right after submission

This model fits teams that:

  • Face high-volume inbound applications where resume review alone is unmanageable
  • Want to replace the resume as the first filter, focusing instead on communication skills, situational judgment, or alignment with values
  • Need to make fast, consistent decisions without drowning in manual screening

Here, the one way interview functions as an enhanced application step. Candidates who apply automatically get a link to record their responses. Recruiters can then skim summaries, transcripts, or scores rather than hundreds of resumes.

The risk is candidate drop-off. Some applicants may be discouraged by an immediate interview request; especially if it’s lengthy. The fix is designing short, accessible interviews (5–10 minutes) and making clear why they matter.

Best for: internships, entry-level roles, or any role with overwhelming inbound volume.

Hybrid approaches are growing

Many teams don’t choose one or the other and blend both. For example:

  • Auto-invite all candidates to a short two-question video screen, then send a longer one way interview to shortlisted candidates.
  • Use qualification questions before the interview (e.g. “Are you eligible to work in this country?”) to filter candidates automatically, then trigger the one way interview for those who qualify.

This balances fairness with efficiency. Everyone gets the chance to show more than what’s on their resume, but recruiters still avoid being buried in irrelevant responses.

Candidate experience considerations

No matter when you use them, how you set up one way interviews matters:

  • Keep them short (under 10 minutes)
  • Offer retake options sparingly to reduce stress
  • Allow text or audio alternatives to improve accessibility
  • Be transparent about how recordings will be used and stored

These guardrails can make the difference between a fair, inclusive process and one that feels like an obstacle course.

The business impact

Choosing when to place one way interviews isn’t just a workflow detail—it affects hiring outcomes. Post-resume use may preserve candidate goodwill but limit speed. Post-submission use maximizes efficiency but requires thoughtful design to keep drop-off low.

The strongest teams see one way interviews as a flexible screening layer that adapts to role type and volume. In a hiring landscape where AI-written resumes are everywhere and recruiter capacity is stretched thin, timing your one way interviews effectively can mean the difference between finding the right people and losing them in the noise.

CEO & Co-Founder
Sean Griffith
Author

Sean began his career in leadership at Best Buy Canada before scaling SimpleTexting from $1MM to $40MM ARR. As COO at Sinch, he led 750+ people and $300MM ARR. A marathoner and sun-chaser, he thrives on big challenges.

Table of contents