Not every company needs a sprawling testing suite to screen candidates. And not every candidate does their best work on abstract logic puzzles. TestGorilla is built for scale, but it is not always built for fit. If you want stronger candidate experience, clearer signals, or pricing that flexes with volume, these TestGorilla alternatives are the ones to beat
Why teams look for TestGorilla alternatives
- Improve candidate experience with mobile-first, async flows
- Get richer signals like communication and portfolio context
- Reduce time spent scheduling and chasing no-shows
- Keep costs predictable for spiky or seasonal hiring
- Plug into the stack without enterprise complexity
1. Truffle – Best for automating phone screens with a human touch
Let's not bury the lede: Truffle is one-way video interview software built specifically for small HR teams and founders who need to quickly build ranked shortlists without sacrificing hiring quality. Instead of drowning in Easy Apply applications or basic screening tests, Truffle enables structured audio or video interviews that help you efficiently evaluate real candidate communication skills.
Candidates complete screening questions on any device at their convenience. Truffle's AI candidate summaries and match analysis then evaluate every response, helping busy founders and solo recruiters quickly build ranked shortlists and make confident hiring decisions faster.

Why teams switch to Truffle:
- One-way interviews eliminate scheduling coordination while improving candidate accessibility
- AI candidate summaries help you quickly build ranked shortlists 5x faster than manual review
- Structured qualification screening filters unqualified applicants before they reach your review queue
- 10-minute setup with no sales calls, contracts, or enterprise complexity required
What to consider:
- Optimized for lean businesses managing lots of applications per role without a large recruiting staff
Ratings
- G2: 4.9 stars
- Capterra: 4.8 stars
Pricing
- $99-129/month with transparent pricing and free trial—not $35K+ enterprise solutions requiring sales processes
If you're exhausted by application coordination chaos and manual phone screen scheduling, Truffle's asynchronous approach delivers automation efficiency while preserving authentic candidate evaluation insights.
2. Hirevire – Best for collecting diverse response formats
Hirevire is a flexible video-first platform where candidates can respond with audio, video, or file uploads. It’s great if you’re screening for roles where portfolio or presentation skills matter like sales, marketing, or design.

Standout features:
- Collects responses in multiple formats
- Easy-to-use interface for both recruiters and candidates
- Integrates with most ATS platforms
Potential drawbacks:
- Less useful for teams with low applicant volume
- Limited analytics beyond response review
Pricing
- One Job plan: $19/month (billed annually)
- Growth plan: $149/month
3. Toggl Hire – Best for skills-first hiring teams
Toggl Hire lets you build fast, job-specific assessments, then automate the rest of the screening funnel. You can add video questions, rank candidates, and even plug into your ATS. If you're a startup that hires for technical or creative roles, this is worth exploring.

Best features:
- Test libraries for 180+ roles
- Candidate scorecards with detailed breakdowns
- Free plan available for occasional hiring
Limitations:
- Reporting features are still fairly basic
- Smaller support community than larger vendors
Pricing
- Free for light usage
- Premium: $100/month billed annually
4. Wamly – Best for SMBs that want async video at scale
Wamly offers a straightforward video screening platform with multiple question types, candidate filters, and custom branding. It’s a favorite among South African businesses and growing internationally.

Key features:
- Self-paced interviews with custom time limits
- Notes, tagging, and ratings for collaborative review
- Smart filtering and reminders
What’s missing:
- Analytics are not as robust as other options
- Not built for live interviews or interactive assessments
Pricing
- Contact Wamly for custom quotes
5. Spark Hire – Best for larger teams who need collaboration tools
Spark Hire has been in the video interviewing game longer than most. With features like live interviews, team commenting, and candidate tagging, it’s well-suited to larger teams with more complex workflows.

Top features:
- One-way and live video options
- Strong collaboration tools for multi-stakeholder hiring
- White-labeling available for enterprise users
Watch-outs:
- Pricing ramps up quickly
- Not ideal for solo recruiters or small HR teams
Pricing
- Starts at $149/month for up to 50 employees
6. Evalgator – Best for proctored technical assessments
Evalgator blends coding tests, video interview questions, and integrity checks into one platform. You can create role-specific assessments with remote proctoring and anti-cheat measures for peace of mind.

Features to note:
- Real-time face tracking for cheating prevention
- Technical and non-technical test libraries
- Collaborative coding environments
Downsides:
- Pricing isn’t public
- Better suited to engineering-heavy orgs
7. Monjin – Best if you want AI avatars
Monjin combines video interviews with AI scoring and sentiment analysis. If you’re hiring for roles where communication and poise matter as much as raw skill, this can help surface those nuances early.

What’s unique:
- Candidate scoring via sentiment analysis
- Structured workflows for large hiring teams
- Strong enterprise support
Considerations:
- Higher learning curve
- Focused on mid-market and above
8. Eddy – Best for all-in-one HR needs
If you're a small business that wants hiring, onboarding, and payroll in one place, Eddy can do it all. It’s less a pure screening tool and more a lightweight HR suite with solid applicant tracking.

Notable features:
- Job board and applicant tracking
- Payroll and time tracking
- Easy onboarding for new hires
But:
- Not designed for deep assessment or interviews
- Limited to US-based employers
Pricing
- Starts at $6/user/month
9. VideoAsk – Best for casual async interviews
VideoAsk is technically a Typeform product but it’s been adopted by recruiters for quick-hit video screening. It’s not a hiring platform per se, but if you're looking for a lightweight way to collect video responses, it's an easy plug-in.

Best for:
- Startups and creative agencies
- Field recruiting or mobile-first workflows
Missing pieces:
- No built-in analytics
- No ATS or scoring features
How to choose the best TestGorilla alternative
- Define your top signal
- Communication quality, real skills, or speed to shortlist
- Choose the primary screening method
- Async video, short skills tests, or proctored technical tasks
- Map integrations
- ATS, calendar, SSO, and data export
- Check candidate experience
- Mobile completion, accessibility, no forced accounts
- Validate pricing against volume
- Self-serve tiers for spiky hiring, or contracts for steady scale
Security, privacy, and DEI checklist
- Ask for GDPR posture and data retention settings
- Request documentation for security controls and audit trails
- Confirm accessibility support for candidates
- Use structured prompts and scoring to reduce bias
- Review adverse impact reporting and monitoring options
Head-to-head quick picks
- Need faster early screens
- Truffle or Spark Hire
- Need diverse response formats
- Hirevire or VideoAsk
- Need skills-first testing
- Toggl Hire or Evalgator
- Need an all-in-one HR hub
- Eddy
FAQs about TestGorilla alternatives
What is the best TestGorilla alternative
The best option depends on your primary signal. Truffle is strong for rapid async screening with AI summaries. Spark Hire suits multi-stakeholder video workflows. Toggl Hire helps skills-first teams ship quick assessments. Hirevire and VideoAsk are great when portfolio or presentation skills matter
How do I decide between TestGorilla competitors
Start with the failure point you want to fix. If scheduling is the problem, pick async video. If noise is the problem, use a short skills test. If collaboration is the problem, choose a platform with reviewer workflows and tagging
Will I need to replace my ATS
No. Most tools offer native ATS integrations or API and CSV exports
How do I control candidate drop-off
Keep early steps short. Make everything mobile-first. Move longer tasks later in the funnel for only the most promising candidates
How should small teams start
Pilot with one role. Use one-way video plus a short work sample. Measure time to shortlist and hiring manager satisfaction, then expand
The wrap
TestGorilla helped normalize skills testing. In 2025, the best screening stacks add speed, clarity, and fairness without adding complexity. Start with the signal you trust most, then pick the tool that delivers it with the least friction
Next step shortlist three tools, run side-by-side demos on a live role, and pick the one your hiring managers want to use