Candidates are leaning into generative AI to churn out polished applications, ace assessments, and even script their video interview responses. And who can blame them?
For years, employers embraced automation in hiring. Tools like async video screening platforms promised to bring structure and speed to early-stage screening.
The response? A full-blown AI arms race. Applicants now use ChatGPT to prep or even read responses in pre-recorded interviews. Meanwhile, employers scramble to “detect” AI use or rethink the tools they once relied on. Even vendors like HireVue now advise bringing human interviewers back into the mix.
We’re not here to declare video interviews broken. But the landscape has changed. If you're using video in your hiring process, you need to understand what’s working, what’s not, and where both employers and candidates stand in 2026.
The stats that follow tell that story. In this article we cover how video interviewing has matured, where it’s delivering value, and how candidates truly feel about it. Let’s dig in.
How common are video interviews in 2026?
Video interviews aren’t just a pandemic-era fix that stuck around. They’ve become foundational to modern hiring. Whether it’s a quick live screen or an asynchronous response recorded on a candidate’s own time, most companies now treat video as a standard part of the hiring funnel. These stats show how widespread the practice has become in 2026, and why it’s not going anywhere.
81% of recruiters now use video interviews as part of their hiring process
– 4 Corner Resources
69% of employers have video interviews embedded in their recruitment workflow
– StandOut CV
93% of companies that use video interviews today plan to continue doing so
– Adaface
One-way video interviews have increased by 67% since 2020
– 4 Corner Resources
More than half of employers kept using video interviews post-COVID
– StandOut CV
For remote roles, 90% of employers don’t require any in-person interview
– StandOut CV
👉 The takeaway: Async screening isn't a "trend." It's now a baseline expectation for companies hiring at volume. And asynchronous formats are gaining traction fast because they let you screen every applicant without phone-screening all of them.
Do video interviews actually improve hiring?
Speed and scale are two of the biggest selling points of video interviews...but do they actually make hiring better? According to recruiters and employers, the answer is yes. From cutting time-to-hire to reducing costs and improving access to talent, video interviews are delivering real gains across the board. Here's what the data shows.
74% of recruiters say video interviews make candidate shortlisting easier
– Recruit CRM
47% of companies use video interviews to reduce time-to-hire
– Adaface
22% of companies say video interviews help them reach non-local talent
– Adaface
Video interviews reduce hiring timelines by 8 days compared to phone screens
– Adaface
45% of recruiters report that video interviews cut hiring costs
– StandOut CV
Fewer than 50% of employers require a face-to-face meeting after a successful video interview
– StandOut CV
21% of employers say video interviews are the single most effective hiring method—up from just 11% in 2020
– Adaface
👉 The takeaway: The shift to video isn’t just for convenience. It speeds up hiring, widens your talent pool, and reduces costs, all while maintaining, and in some cases improving, interview quality.
What do candidates think about video interviews?
Employers may love the efficiency of video interviews, but candidates have a more complicated relationship with them. While many appreciate the flexibility, others find the format stressful, impersonal, or prone to technical issues. These stats offer a closer look at how job seekers really feel about video-based hiring in 2026.
Nearly 50% of candidates say they prefer video interviews to in-person
– Adaface
25% of candidates find video interviews more stressful
– StandOut CV
70% of candidates have lost a job opportunity due to tech issues during a video interview
– StandOut CV
15% of candidates have had a video interview interrupted at home
– StandOut CV
10% of candidates admit to doing video interviews secretly from their current job
– StandOut CV
33% of candidates say they’ve quit an application that required a one-way video interview
– Select Software Reviews
98% of candidates believe companies that use video interviews are more innovative
– Adaface
👉 The takeaway: Candidates like flexibility, but hate friction. One-way videos can be a dealbreaker if not handled well. Tech hiccups and lack of human interaction are two areas worth investing in.
What this means for HR and recruiting teams
Video interviewing isn't just "here to stay"—it's becoming the first step in surfacing, assessing, and prioritizing candidates for human review. But while the numbers point to speed and scale, candidate experience still matters.
If you’re using video interviews, especially one-way recordings, it’s worth asking:
- Are we clearly setting expectations for candidates?
- Are we testing our tech experience across devices and internet speeds?
- Are we giving applicants a chance to show who they are—through their responses, their approach to situations, and their work preferences?
Done right, AI-assisted screening reduces manual work without dehumanizing the process. And they offer growing companies the kind of reach, speed, and structure that used to require enterprise-scale resources.
The wrap on our video interview statistics
The best HR teams in 2026 aren’t choosing between speed and empathy, they’re using tools that deliver both.
Truffle's AI-assisted screening platform gives candidates the flexibility to respond on their own time—through video and AI-resistant assessments—and gives you AI-generated summaries, match scores, and Candidate Shorts to move faster. No more choosing between speed and thoroughness when you have 40+ applicants. No more guesswork. Just structured async interviews, AI-resistant assessments that measure what AI can't fake, and AI-generated summaries with match scores—so you can screen every applicant without phone-screening all of them, all without compromising the human element.
Ready to make your screening process more efficient? Try Truffle for free.
The TL;DR
Candidates are leaning into generative AI to churn out polished applications, ace assessments, and even script their video interview responses. And who can blame them?
For years, employers embraced automation in hiring. Tools like async video screening platforms promised to bring structure and speed to early-stage screening.
The response? A full-blown AI arms race. Applicants now use ChatGPT to prep or even read responses in pre-recorded interviews. Meanwhile, employers scramble to “detect” AI use or rethink the tools they once relied on. Even vendors like HireVue now advise bringing human interviewers back into the mix.
We’re not here to declare video interviews broken. But the landscape has changed. If you're using video in your hiring process, you need to understand what’s working, what’s not, and where both employers and candidates stand in 2026.
The stats that follow tell that story. In this article we cover how video interviewing has matured, where it’s delivering value, and how candidates truly feel about it. Let’s dig in.
How common are video interviews in 2026?
Video interviews aren’t just a pandemic-era fix that stuck around. They’ve become foundational to modern hiring. Whether it’s a quick live screen or an asynchronous response recorded on a candidate’s own time, most companies now treat video as a standard part of the hiring funnel. These stats show how widespread the practice has become in 2026, and why it’s not going anywhere.
81% of recruiters now use video interviews as part of their hiring process
– 4 Corner Resources
69% of employers have video interviews embedded in their recruitment workflow
– StandOut CV
93% of companies that use video interviews today plan to continue doing so
– Adaface
One-way video interviews have increased by 67% since 2020
– 4 Corner Resources
More than half of employers kept using video interviews post-COVID
– StandOut CV
For remote roles, 90% of employers don’t require any in-person interview
– StandOut CV
👉 The takeaway: Async screening isn't a "trend." It's now a baseline expectation for companies hiring at volume. And asynchronous formats are gaining traction fast because they let you screen every applicant without phone-screening all of them.
Do video interviews actually improve hiring?
Speed and scale are two of the biggest selling points of video interviews...but do they actually make hiring better? According to recruiters and employers, the answer is yes. From cutting time-to-hire to reducing costs and improving access to talent, video interviews are delivering real gains across the board. Here's what the data shows.
74% of recruiters say video interviews make candidate shortlisting easier
– Recruit CRM
47% of companies use video interviews to reduce time-to-hire
– Adaface
22% of companies say video interviews help them reach non-local talent
– Adaface
Video interviews reduce hiring timelines by 8 days compared to phone screens
– Adaface
45% of recruiters report that video interviews cut hiring costs
– StandOut CV
Fewer than 50% of employers require a face-to-face meeting after a successful video interview
– StandOut CV
21% of employers say video interviews are the single most effective hiring method—up from just 11% in 2020
– Adaface
👉 The takeaway: The shift to video isn’t just for convenience. It speeds up hiring, widens your talent pool, and reduces costs, all while maintaining, and in some cases improving, interview quality.
What do candidates think about video interviews?
Employers may love the efficiency of video interviews, but candidates have a more complicated relationship with them. While many appreciate the flexibility, others find the format stressful, impersonal, or prone to technical issues. These stats offer a closer look at how job seekers really feel about video-based hiring in 2026.
Nearly 50% of candidates say they prefer video interviews to in-person
– Adaface
25% of candidates find video interviews more stressful
– StandOut CV
70% of candidates have lost a job opportunity due to tech issues during a video interview
– StandOut CV
15% of candidates have had a video interview interrupted at home
– StandOut CV
10% of candidates admit to doing video interviews secretly from their current job
– StandOut CV
33% of candidates say they’ve quit an application that required a one-way video interview
– Select Software Reviews
98% of candidates believe companies that use video interviews are more innovative
– Adaface
👉 The takeaway: Candidates like flexibility, but hate friction. One-way videos can be a dealbreaker if not handled well. Tech hiccups and lack of human interaction are two areas worth investing in.
What this means for HR and recruiting teams
Video interviewing isn't just "here to stay"—it's becoming the first step in surfacing, assessing, and prioritizing candidates for human review. But while the numbers point to speed and scale, candidate experience still matters.
If you’re using video interviews, especially one-way recordings, it’s worth asking:
- Are we clearly setting expectations for candidates?
- Are we testing our tech experience across devices and internet speeds?
- Are we giving applicants a chance to show who they are—through their responses, their approach to situations, and their work preferences?
Done right, AI-assisted screening reduces manual work without dehumanizing the process. And they offer growing companies the kind of reach, speed, and structure that used to require enterprise-scale resources.
The wrap on our video interview statistics
The best HR teams in 2026 aren’t choosing between speed and empathy, they’re using tools that deliver both.
Truffle's AI-assisted screening platform gives candidates the flexibility to respond on their own time—through video and AI-resistant assessments—and gives you AI-generated summaries, match scores, and Candidate Shorts to move faster. No more choosing between speed and thoroughness when you have 40+ applicants. No more guesswork. Just structured async interviews, AI-resistant assessments that measure what AI can't fake, and AI-generated summaries with match scores—so you can screen every applicant without phone-screening all of them, all without compromising the human element.
Ready to make your screening process more efficient? Try Truffle for free.
Try Truffle instead.
