Hiring remotely opens up your talent pool, but it also introduces complexity: how do you find the right people, vet them fairly, and get them onboarded compliantly? These 16 remote interview tools solve different pieces of the puzzle—from sourcing to interviews to international payroll—so you can build a distributed team with confidence.
The best video interview tools at a glance
This table breaks down the 16 best interview tools, pricing, and what they're great at.
1. Truffle
Truffle, our top recommendation for one-way video interview software that transforms high-volume screening
What it delivers: Truffle helps small HR teams and founders quickly build ranked shortlists through structured asynchronous screening. Candidates complete interviews at their convenience on any device, while Truffle's AI candidate summaries provide manager-ready insights with communication evaluation, cultural fit analysis, and role alignment indicators. Small talent acquisition teams reclaim hours weekly—no coordination chaos, no video call scheduling, no Easy Apply application overwhelm.
Advantages:
- Audio and video response options accommodate different candidate comfort levels and accessibility needs
- Zero downloads, account creation, or app installations required for applicants
- Integrated qualification screening and AI-powered evaluation methods
- AI candidate summaries enable rapid, consistent candidate review for busy founders
- Perfectly suited for remote-first hiring workflows and distributed teams
- Fast, easy setup that lets you create interview flows in minutes—ideal for lean recruiting teams
Limitations:
- Focused on communication-based screening rather than technical skill assessment
Investment: $99-129/month with transparent pricing and comprehensive AI analysis included. Flexible monthly billing with 10-minute setup—no sales calls, contracts, or hidden enterprise fees required.
2. Spark Hire
Spark Hire, best for those who need a remote interview tool with enterprise polish
What it does: Spark Hire lets you run both one-way video interviews from one platform. You can record questions in advance, allow candidates to respond asynchronously, or host branded live video calls with automatic recording. It's a go-to for distributed teams.
Pros:
- Unlimited async and live interviews on all plans
- Shareable videos with manager feedback tools
- ATS integrations and calendar scheduling built in
- Excellent global support team
Cons:
- Higher price point (~$299/month)
- English-only interface
- No free plan or trial
Pricing: Plans start around $299/month. Annual discounts available.
3. Willo
Willo, best for multi-language async video screening
What it does: Willo is a popular one-way video interview software with transparent pricing andsupport for 10+ languages. It’s easy to get started and even easier for candidates to complete.
Pros:
- Free tier available
- No logins or downloads required
- Automated email nudges and ID verification
- Multilingual support
Cons:
- No live interview option
- Limited integrations unless you use Zapier
- No transcription or advanced analytics
Pricing: Paid plans from ~$249/month.
4. myInterview
myInterview, best for fast personality-based shortlisting
What it does: myInterview uses AI to score candidates' video responses based on soft skills and personality fit. It also includes drag-and-drop workflows, scheduling tools, and candidate pipelines.
Pros:
- AI scoring surfaces top-fit candidates fast
- Scheduler and Kanban-style applicant tracking
Cons:
- No free tier anymore
- No live interviews
- Some branding and email features cost extra
Pricing: Paid plans only; pricing available on request.
5. Hireflix
Hireflix, best for simple async interviews with clean UX.
What it does: Hireflix focuses exclusively on one-way video interviews. It offers unlimited candidates, unlimited interviews, and a 30-day free trial. Great for teams that want simplicity and scalability.
Pros:
- No candidate logins or app required
- Clean, branded interface with auto-transcription
- Shareable interviews with team feedback tools
Cons:
- No live interview capability
- Limited integrations
- No built-in scheduler
Pricing: Pricing is ~$75-$150/month.
6. Jobma
Jobma, best for mixed-format interviews with AI support
What it does: Jobma handles video, audio, written, and coding interviews all in one platform. It includes live interviews, resume scoring, and fraud detection via AI.
Pros:
- All interview types in one tool
- Built-in proctoring and resume ranking
- 20+ language support
Cons:
- No public pricing
- Limited depth on technical challenges
Pricing: Quote-based
7. Recright
Recright, best for video interviewing with ATS features built in
What it does: Recright offers on-demand video interviews and live video interviewing with a lightweight ATS. It’s intuitive, multilingual, and includes candidate feedback collection.
Pros:
- Built-in job tracking
- ISO 27001 and GDPR compliant
- Transparent pricing and free trial
Cons:
- Scheduling and some integrations are paid add-ons
- No pause button for candidates
Pricing: Tiered by number of job postings; starts with 14-day free trial.
8. InterviewStream
InterviewStream, best for flexible interview formats and scheduling
What it does: InterviewStream offers a full suite for self-paced interviews, live video calls, and automated scheduling. It also includes interview guides and evaluation forms for structured hiring.
Pros:
- Supports multiple interview formats
- Customizable question libraries
- Calendar integrations
Cons:
- Outdated user interface
- Setup complexity for some features
Pricing: Quote-based; suited for mid-sized orgs with modular needs.
9. Zoom
Zoom, best for live interviews with universal access
What it does: Zoom is a reliable and widely used video conferencing platform for live interviews. It’s familiar to most candidates and supports screen sharing and recordings.
Pros:
- Ubiquitous and easy to use
- Breakout rooms and waiting areas
- Free for 1:1 interviews
Cons:
- Not recruiting-specific
- Limited interview tools (no scorecards, ATS integration)
Pricing: Free for 1:1, Pro plan starts at ~$15/month.
10. Whereby
Whereby, best for lightweight, no-download video interviews
What it does: Whereby offers browser-based video calls that are ideal for interviews without downloads or logins. Simple, branded, and mobile-friendly.
Pros:
- No downloads or accounts required
- Custom branding options
- GDPR and HIPAA compliant
Cons:
- 45-minute cap on free plan
- Lacks scheduling and ATS tools
Pricing: Free plan available; Pro starts at $9.99/month.
11. Calendly
Calendly, best for self-service interview scheduling
What it does: Calendly eliminates scheduling back-and-forth by letting candidates choose interview slots. It integrates with calendars and video platforms.
Pros:
- Time zone detection
- Zoom/Google Meet integrations
- Free plan includes basic functionality
Cons:
- Limited branding on free tier
- No built-in interviewer coordination
Pricing: Free tier; paid from $8/user/month.
12. ScheduleOnce
ScheduleOnce, best for complex multi-interviewer scheduling
What it does: ScheduleOnce manages interviews involving multiple team members, rounds, and time zones. Ideal for panel interviews or sequential interviews.
Pros:
- Handles complex availability logic
- Branded scheduling pages
- SMS and email reminders
Cons:
- Learning curve for setup
- No free plan beyond trial
Pricing: Free 14-day trial; plans from ~$10–15/user/month.
13. BrightHire
BrightHire, best for live interview intelligence and coaching
What it does: BrightHire records live interviews and provides searchable transcripts, AI highlights, and coaching tools for consistent hiring.
Pros:
- Timestamped interview replays
- Bias-reduction tools
- Team collaboration features
Cons:
- Requires interviewer training
- Focused only on live interviews
Pricing: Per user or usage-based; quote required.
14. Metaview
Metaview, best for real-time AI interview feedback
What it does: Metaview joins interviews to generate automated summaries, track competencies, and coach interviewers live.
Pros:
- Talk/listen ratio and topic tracking
- Integrates with the best ATS platforms
- Post-interview analytics
Cons:
- AI customization is limited
- NLP accuracy can vary
Pricing: SaaS pricing per interviewer license.
15. VideoAsk
VideoAsk, best for engaging, conversational async Q&A
What it does: VideoAsk lets hiring teams ask questions via video and receive responses in video, audio, or text. It feels like a conversation, even when async.
Pros:
- Humanizes async interviews
- No login required
- Works well on mobile
Cons:
- No ATS or evaluation tools
- Branching logic only on higher plans
Pricing: Free plan available; paid starts at ~$24/month.
16. CoderPad
CoderPad, best for technical coding interviews
What it does: CoderPad provides a collaborative coding environment with real-time execution and video chat for technical roles.
Pros:
- 30+ language support
- Whiteboard and replay features
- Real-time test execution
Cons:
- Focused only on developer roles
- No AI scoring built in
Pricing: Free trial available; paid from ~$100/month depending on usage.
Building your remote interview tool stack
There’s no single “best” remote interview tool for every hiring team. But there is a best tool for your specific workflow. If you’re trying to automate top-of-funnel screening and reclaim your time, Truffle’s interviewing software is unmatched. If you want rich video recordings or live interviews with ATS sync, Spark Hire works well.
Mix and match based on what matters most: async vs. live, budget vs. breadth, speed vs. scorecards. Even the smallest companies can now compete with enterprise hiring teams, all without hiring more recruiters or stretching the calendar.
Want help setting up your interview workflow? Get started with Truffle and take candidate screening off your plate.
FAQ
Who is this guide for?
Founders, lean HR teams, and distributed companies that want to screen faster, keep interviews consistent, and stay compliant across time zones
What counts as a remote interview tool?
Any software that helps you source, screen, schedule, interview, or assess candidates without being in the same room
What’s the difference between async and live interviews?
- Async: candidates record answers on their own time, you review when convenient
- Live: real-time video calls with back-and-forth conversation
Async reduces scheduling overhead and gives you consistent, structured signals. Live is best for final conversations and collaboration exercises
When should I use one-way video interviews?
- High volume roles where speed and consistency matter
- Global hiring across time zones
- Early screening to replace résumé scans and phone screens
Are one-way interviews fair?
They can be, if you design them well
- Ask the same structured questions for every candidate
- Offer audio or video options for accessibility
- Use clear rubrics and train reviewers on what “good” looks like
- Avoid analyzing demographics, accents, backgrounds, or non-job-related cues
- Document data retention and consent
How does Truffle fit into this stack?
Truffle handles the messy first screen for remote teams
- Candidates answer via short audio or video with no downloads or logins
- AI summaries highlight communication, culture indicators, and role alignment
- You get a ranked shortlist that managers can review quickly
- Best for SMBs and lean teams that need speed without added headcount
Do candidates need special software?
Most tools here run in the browser on desktop or mobile. Truffle, Willo, Hireflix, VideoAsk, Whereby, and Zoom emphasize no downloads or simple joins to keep completion rates high
What if I just use Zoom for interviews?
Zoom works for live conversations, but it’s not purpose-built for structured hiring
- No built-in scorecards or standardized rubrics
- Limited ATS connectivity compared with interview platforms
- Harder to run consistent, comparable first-round screens at scale
How do I cover scheduling without back-and-forth?
Use a scheduler for self-serve bookings
- Simple: Calendly for single interviewer flows
- Complex: ScheduleOnce for panels, rounds, and time-zone juggling
How do I assess developers remotely?
Pair a coding environment with your interview flow
- Use CoderPad for collaborative coding and whiteboarding
- Keep async screens focused on role context and communication, then validate technical depth live
Which tools help with interview quality and coaching?
For live interviews
- BrightHire for searchable recordings, transcripts, and replay
- Metaview for real-time feedback, talk-listen ratios, and summaries
What about multilingual or global candidates?
Pick tools with language flexibility and accessibility
- Willo offers 10+ language support
- Jobma supports 20+ languages
- Keep prompts concise and provide written versions of questions when possible
Can these tools connect to my ATS?
Yes, most support direct integrations or Zapier
- Truffle and Hireflix share shortlists and links easily and can push results with lightweight connectors
- Spark Hire and Metaview offer deeper native ATS integrations on higher tiers
How much should I budget?
Based on the tools in this guide
- Truffle: $99–129 per month for async screening with AI summaries
- Hireflix: ~$75–150 per month for simple async interviews
- Willo: paid from ~$249 per month with multilingual support
- Spark Hire: starts around ~$299 per month with async + live
- Calendly and Whereby: affordable add-ons for scheduling and lightweight live calls
- CoderPad, BrightHire, Metaview: usage or per-seat pricing, typically quote or tiered
How do I keep candidate drop-off low?
- Limit first-round questions to 4–6 with a 10–12 minute total target
- Offer audio as an alternative to video
- Let candidates practice before recording
- Be transparent about what happens next and how long videos are retained
- Send gentle reminders, ideally time-zone aware
How do I handle AI-generated or coached answers?
- State your policy clearly up front
- Use question types that require role context, examples, and reflection
- Mix formats: a few timed answers, a brief written follow-up, or a live calibration step
- Compare across questions for consistency rather than a single “perfect” response
What should I track to prove this works?
- Time to first shortlist
- Completion rate for async screens
- Percentage of candidates advanced from shortlist to live
- Hiring manager satisfaction with signal quality
- Time saved vs phone screens
- Offer acceptance rate and early attrition
What about compliance and data privacy?
- Get explicit candidate consent for recording and processing
- Limit analysis to job-relevant signals
- Set clear retention windows and deletion workflows
- Ensure vendors meet GDPR and security best practices, especially for EU hiring
What’s a good minimal stack for remote hiring?
- Truffle for async screening and shortlists
- Calendly or ScheduleOnce for booking live rounds
- Zoom or Whereby for live conversations
- CoderPad if you hire engineers
Add BrightHire or Metaview later if you need deeper interview intelligence
How do I get started quickly?
- Pick one role and define 4–6 structured questions tied to outcomes
- Launch an async screen in Truffle and share the shortlist with a hiring manager
- Layer in scheduling for finalists and add a technical or work sample step if needed
- Review metrics after one cycle and refine the prompts and rubrics
Which tool should I choose first?
- Need to clear top-of-funnel fast: Truffle
- Want async and live in one enterprise package: Spark Hire
- Hiring across many languages async-first: Willo
- Prefer ultra-simple async with clean UX: Hireflix
- Coaching and analytics for live interviews: BrightHire or Metaview
- Technical roles with coding exercises: CoderPad
