7 best Willo alternatives for small businesses in 2026 (compared and priced)

Willo earns its reputation. It’s one of the simplest one-way video tools you can buy, candidates like it, and on Capterra it holds a 4.7/5 from 39 reviews, with especially strong marks for ease of use. If your whole screening problem is “too many first-round calls,” Willo solves it without much fuss.

Willo also isn’t standing still. In 2026 it rebranded around “intelligent candidate screening,” its label for AI candidate screening software, added a named set of AI tools (Transcribe, Summarize, Benchmark, Real Talk follow-up questions, and a beta insights layer), and started on identity verification for both sides of the hire: Willo Proof checks that the employer posting the role is real, and Willo Verified, which checks the candidate, is listed as coming in the second half of 2026. Willo also rebuilt its pricing since we last checked. The old Growth and Scale tiers are gone. There’s now a pay-as-you-go Lite plan and an annual-contract Enterprise plan, and Lite includes Summarize, Benchmark and follow-up questions. Transcribe, Insights scoring and Willo Verified are still Enterprise-only, so part of the AI is gated by plan. Actually running an ID check, a right-to-work check, or a background check still costs extra on either plan, as an add-on on Lite and through credits on Enterprise. If you last looked at Willo a year ago, it’s a genuinely different pricing page now.

But the reason people end up on this page hasn’t changed. Willo still collects and scores one signal: video. Resume screening lives in another tool. Its assessment library has grown to 1,500+ role-based assessments, but usage is still capped: the Lite plan caps you at 150 assessed candidates per live role across up to 5 concurrent roles, and only the Enterprise plan lifts that ceiling. And if you’re the one running hiring on top of your actual job, with nobody else to read the applications, you’re often still watching recordings to find the signal.

So the search for a Willo alternative is usually a search for one of three things: more screening signals in one place, deeper scoring, or enterprise-grade workflow. I’ve grouped the 7 best options by exactly that.

How we evaluate and test recruiting software

Our reviews are written by recruiters and TA professionals who have spent years using, testing, and buying hiring tools. We evaluate every product against the same criteria: what it actually does, what it costs, how fast you can get value from it, and whether it solves the screening problems in-house teams and owner-operators screening solo face every day. Truffle is our product, and we are upfront about that. We describe every tool, ours included, by what it actually does and who it fits best. We think recruiters deserve honest comparisons, not marketing disguised as editorial.

The 7 best Willo alternatives in 2026

• Truffle for teams that want resume screening, one-way video interviews, and talent assessments in one place
• Spark Hire for teams that want video plus an ATS from one vendor
• Hireflix for one-way video with flat pricing that doesn’t move with how many roles you’re running
• VidCruiter for enterprise teams with complex, structured hiring workflows
• Jobma for global and technical hiring with coding tests
• myInterview for high-volume hourly hiring with automated candidate follow-up
• HireVue for enterprise programs hiring thousands per year

What makes the best Willo alternative?

Willo’s appeal is that it does one job simply, and in 2026 it added real trust features on top of that job. The best alternative, whether it’s another video tool or full AI candidate screening software, keeps the simplicity where it counts and fixes the thing that sent you looking. Here’s what I’d weigh:

• More than one screening signal. Resumes are AI-polished, and a recorded answer is one hour of best behavior compressed into three minutes. The strongest alternatives let you stack signals (resumes, one-way interviews, assessments) so the evidence compounds instead of resting on a single format.
• Scoring you can interrogate. A wall of 40 recordings isn’t a shortlist. Look for tools where AI scores candidates against the criteria you set and shows the reasoning, so you can check its work rather than take a number on faith. The decision should stay with you.
• Trust that goes beyond identity. Willo Proof, and Willo Verified once it ships, confirm that an employer and a candidate are who they claim to be, which is a real problem worth solving. But knowing someone is real doesn’t tell you if they’re right for the role. Weigh whether a tool stops at verification or gives you evidence about fit too.
• Follow-up flexibility, if you need it. Willo’s format is genuinely one-way: a candidate answers a set prompt with no live back-and-forth. That’s fine for a first-round screen. If a role needs a live follow-up question or panel input before you decide, only some tools here offer it (Jobma and VidCruiter both run live and panel modes alongside async). Truffle handles the screening rounds before the live conversation; teams run final interviews in Zoom or Meet as usual.
• Pricing that scales the way you hire. Willo’s Lite plan now charges per live role rather than a flat monthly fee, so cost moves with how many roles you have open at once. Several alternatives on this list gate assessment usage or hide pricing entirely too. Check whether the plan you’re comparing charges by role, by seat, or by credit, and run your actual volume through the math before you compare sticker prices.
• Candidate experience that survives the switch. Willo’s browser-based, no-download flow is a real strength. Don’t trade it for a tool that makes candidates create accounts or install apps unless you’re getting something substantial back.
• Setup that matches your team. Some of these tools go live in minutes. Others are a quarter-long implementation with professional services. Both are fine, but know which one you’re signing up for, especially if there’s no IT team behind you to run it.

The best Willo alternatives at a glance

Ratings are Capterra’s published averages, verified in August 2026; review counts are small for some of these tools, so read them as a signal, not a verdict. Pricing was verified the same month. The HireVue figure is buyer-reported data from Vendr, not an official price. Where a vendor publishes nothing, we say so rather than guess.

The “Screens” column is the fastest way to see why teams end up looking past Willo. Willo and five of the six alternatives here still score one signal (video, sometimes with assessments bolted on). Only Truffle scores all three: resumes, one-way interviews, and assessments, in the same ranked list.

Best for combining resume screening, one-way interviews, and assessments

Truffle

Truffle is our product, so read this section knowing that. It exists because of the exact gap that sends people away from Willo: one-way video interviews are one signal, and one signal is rarely enough to bet a hire on, especially when there’s nobody double-checking your read.

Truffle is an AI screening platform that combines resume screening, one-way video interviews, and talent assessments in one workflow. You design the screening that fits the role: resumes alone for a fast cut, resumes plus a one-way interview, or all three with an assessment layered in. AI scores every candidate against the criteria you set and shows the reasoning behind each score. You get a ranked shortlist with the evidence attached, and the hire stays yours to make. Truffle is rated 4.9/5 on G2.

Willo’s answer to trust in 2026 is verification: it confirms a candidate is a real person and an employer is a real business. That’s genuinely useful, and worth having if fake applicants or fake job posts are a problem you’re seeing. But it answers a different question than the one you’re actually stuck on at 9pm with a stack of resumes. Knowing someone is who they say they are doesn’t tell you whether they’re right for the role. Truffle’s answer is depth of evidence about fit: a resume scored against what the role needs, a recorded answer that shows how someone actually communicates, an assessment that shows judgment and work style, and a match score with the reasoning attached to every one of them. You’re not just confirming a candidate is real. You’re building a case for why they’re worth a call.

The assessment gap is a good example of what “one signal” costs you in practice. Willo’s Lite plan caps you at 150 assessed candidates per live role, and even Willo’s own product doesn’t include a validated personality assessment. Truffle includes all three assessment types, Personality, Situational Judgment, and Environment Fit, on every plan with no per-role or per-tier cap, because assessments are the layer that shows judgment and work style, not an extra you pay more to get.

Key features

• Resume screening scores every resume against your criteria before anyone records a thing, so obvious mismatches never cost you review time
• One-way interviews with Candidate Shorts, 30-second clips of each candidate’s most revealing moments, so you’re not watching full recordings to find the signal
• Talent assessments covering Personality (built on validated Big Five research), Situational Judgment, and Environment Fit, all included rather than capped by plan
• AI Match scores with the reasoning shown, so you can see exactly why each candidate ranked where they did against your criteria
• Combined candidate evidence view that brings resumes, one-way answers, and assessment results into one ranked list, so a decision rests on a case instead of a hunch
• Every feature on every plan. Plans differ by credit pool, not by which capabilities you get. Unlimited positions and team members on all of them

Works alongside

• The ATS you already use, or no ATS at all. Truffle handles screening; your ATS keeps offer letters and onboarding
• Zoom or Meet for final interviews. Truffle handles the screening rounds before the live conversation

Pricing

Plans run from $49/month (Starter) to $599/month (Scale), plus a Custom tier. It’s credit-based: a screened resume costs 1 credit, an assessed candidate 2, a completed one-way interview 5, all from one shared pool. Unused credits roll over on Core and up (capped at three months’ worth), so you can hire in bursts instead of on a schedule. The 7-day free trial includes 30 credits and needs no credit card. Full details on the pricing page, and the side-by-side is in our full Willo comparison.

Best for teams that want video plus an ATS from one vendor

Spark Hire

Spark Hire has been in video interviewing longer than almost anyone, and in 2026 it’s really two products. Meet handles one-way and live video interviews. Recruit is a full applicant tracking system built on the Comeet ATS it acquired. If your Willo frustration is “I want my video tool and my ATS to be the same system,” this is the most direct answer on the list.

The one-way video itself is mature and easy for candidates, and Spark Hire publishes most of its prices, which puts it ahead of half this category. The catch is that everything is a separate line item. We’ve broken down the full structure in our Spark Hire pricing guide and compared the two head-to-head in Willo vs Spark Hire.

Key features

• One-way and live video interviews in one platform, so first screens and finals stay in one place
• Built-in scorecards so a distributed team rates candidates against the same rubric
• Candidate data syncs automatically with 40+ ATS platforms, Greenhouse, Lever, and BambooHR among them, so nobody’s re-entering applicants by hand
• A behavioral assessment product that adds a personality signal on top of video, billed and bought as its own subscription
• Recruit, the ATS side, posts your job to boards, builds a careers page, and runs AI resume review, if you’re ready for the annual-only commitment that comes with it

What to consider

• Per-product pricing adds up. Video and assessments are separate subscriptions, roughly $498/month combined on annual billing before you touch the ATS
• The month-to-month Meet plan caps you at 5 jobs and 5 users; unlimited only kicks in on annual billing
• Recruit is annual-only, so trying the ATS means a year-long commitment
• You still watch the recordings. Spark Hire captures and transcribes video, but reviewing every recording stays with you

Pricing

Meet runs $299/month month-to-month or $249/month billed annually, and the assessment product is priced the same, separately. Recruit starts at $335/month (Pro, 6,000 AI resume review credits a year) and $499/month (Growth, 24,000 credits a year), both annual-only, with Enterprise quote-only. A free trial isn’t clearly advertised in 2026; the reliable path in is a demo.

Best for one-way video with flat, unmetered pricing

Hireflix

If your reaction to Willo’s pricing was “I like the product, I just want it simpler,” Hireflix is the honest answer. It does one thing, one-way video interviews, and it charges one flat rate no matter how many roles you’re running. It’s also the highest-rated tool on this list by review volume: 5.0/5 on Capterra from 256 reviews, more than every other alternative here combined.

Candidates click a link and record in the browser, no accounts or downloads. Setup is a same-day job. Every plan includes unlimited positions and unlimited interview responses, so there’s no tier-shopping and no per-role math. The trade is that the flat price reflects a deliberately narrow product. There’s no AI scoring and no candidate summaries, so if you invite 60 candidates, you’re watching or skimming 60 sets of recordings yourself. Hireflix keeps costs predictable for teams whose volume makes manual review workable. It doesn’t shorten the review.

Key features

• One-way video interviews with a clean, no-login candidate flow
• Straightforward same-day setup, closer to building a form than implementing software
• Unlimited positions and unlimited interview responses on every plan, so cost doesn’t move with how many roles you have open
• ATS integrations cover the basics, and an open API picks up anything custom you need to build yourself

What to consider

• No AI analysis. No scoring, no summaries, so review time scales linearly with candidate volume
• No live interviews, assessments, or resume screening. It’s a single-signal tool by design, the same shape as Willo but leaner
• Reporting and analytics are light compared to bigger platforms
• No permanent free plan anymore. There’s a one-month free trial to test it, then you’re on a paid tier

Pricing

Starts at $75/month for the Small plan (under 50 employees), billed yearly, with unlimited positions included. Medium runs $150/month for 50-250 employees, and larger teams get a custom quote. There’s a one-month free trial, not a permanent free tier. Worth doing the math against Willo’s per-role Lite plan: at one open role, Willo’s $59/month undercuts Hireflix. Run two roles at once and Hireflix’s flat $75 (billed yearly) pulls ahead of Willo’s $118. On monthly billing Hireflix is $150, so it takes three roles ($177 on Willo) before it pulls ahead.

Best for enterprise structured hiring workflows

VidCruiter

VidCruiter has been building video recruitment software since 2009, and it’s grown into a full enterprise suite: one-way and live interviews, automated scheduling, skills testing, automated reference checks, and proctoring, all wired into workflows you can customize stage by stage. Where Willo assumes your process is simple, VidCruiter assumes it’s complicated and gives you the tooling to model it.

Reviewers consistently praise the support and onboarding teams, and it shows in the numbers: 4.6/5 on Capterra from 125 reviews, with customer service scoring even higher (4.9/5) than the overall rating. The flip side is that the product is built around the assumption that you have IT resources and time for a proper implementation. Small teams tend to find the option surface overwhelming, and reviewers note mobile and Chromebook compatibility gaps plus calendar-sync friction in scheduling.

Key features

• One-way and live video interviews with structured, customizable hiring workflows
• Automated interview scheduling synced to your team’s calendars
• Skills tests run with video proctoring, so a remote result is harder to fake
• Automated reference checks that chase responses for you
• Panel-style evaluation tools let several interviewers score the same candidate on one shared rubric

What to consider

• No published pricing and no free trial. Everything runs through a sales process, and implementation typically involves professional services on top of the platform fee
• Setup is measured in weeks to months, not minutes
• Smaller teams often find it overly complex for their needs, paying for configurability they won’t use

Pricing

Contact sales pricing. VidCruiter publishes no rates, contracts are typically annual, and mid-market buyers report annual contracts in the five-figure range (treat that as a practitioner-reported estimate, not a quote).

Best for global and technical hiring

Jobma

Jobma says it serves customers in 40 countries, and its pitch is breadth: one-way, live, and panel interviews, plus built-in coding tests and technical challenges that Willo simply doesn’t have. For engineering-heavy hiring, that’s the difference between screening on presentation and screening on demonstrated skill. It holds a 4.6/5 on Capterra from 41 reviews, on par with VidCruiter and just behind Willo.

It also brings structure. Custom scoring rubrics let you weight criteria per role (say, technical accuracy at 50%, communication at 30%) so a panel of interviewers rates candidates the same way. AI transcribes interviews, scores responses against the rubrics you define (scoring is opt-in and off by default), and can suggest questions from a job description. Multi-language support makes it a fit for teams hiring across regions, one of the few areas where it competes with Willo’s genuine strength.

Key features

• Run one-way, live, or panel interviews from the same platform, so a technical panel round doesn’t need a separate tool
• Built-in coding tests with proctoring that flags suspicious behavior during assessments
• Custom scoring rubrics with weighted criteria for consistent multi-reviewer evaluation
• Candidate results flow into Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, or BambooHR automatically, and a REST API covers anything those don’t
• Interviews run in multiple languages, so one process covers hiring across several markets at once

What to consider

• No published pricing. Quotes are custom, based on volume, integrations, and feature needs, and contract terms aren’t published, so ask whether you’re locking in an annual interview volume that can sting if your hiring fluctuates
• Implementation is run by Jobma’s team, and it says the timeline varies, so budget for branding, rubric, and ATS setup
• It’s heavier than most small teams need. If you’re not using the technical testing or panel tooling, you’re paying for scaffolding you won’t touch

Pricing

Contact sales pricing. AI scoring is opt-in and off by default, so confirm what your quote includes and switches on before comparing it against bundled tools.

Best for high-volume hourly hiring

myInterview

myInterview built its platform around one job: getting large volumes of candidates through a one-way video screen with as little recruiter effort as possible. Its AI assistant (once branded Taira, now Radancy’s Screening & Scheduling Bot) handles the chasing (invitations, reminders, deadline nudges) and scores responses against a scorecard you define, which recruiters use as an early signal for customer-facing roles where delivery matters as much as content. Pre-acquisition reviews put it at 4.7/5 on Capterra from 41 reviews, in the same range as Willo and Jobma.

The candidate experience is mobile-first with no downloads, and hiring managers can review candidates through secure links without needing full accounts. For retail, call center, and seasonal hiring, that combination of automation and low friction is the draw. The big change for 2026 buyers: Radancy acquired myInterview (announced September 2025) and now sells it as Radancy Screening & Scheduling, and the absorption is now further along than it was a year ago. The myInterview brand has been pulled from its own web properties, public pricing is gone, and the buying motion runs through Radancy’s enterprise sales team rather than a self-serve signup. Whether that suite context is a plus depends entirely on your size.

Key features

• An AI assistant (formerly Taira) that automates invites, reminders, and candidate follow-ups
• AI scorecard scoring of responses against criteria you define, plus Smart Shortlisting on personality markers (the read on who advances stays with you)
• Mobile-first, no-download candidate experience with SMS invites
• Built-in interview scheduling with calendar sync and a Microsoft Teams bot
• Radancy says it works with any ATS; older listings name Greenhouse and Workable among its integrations

What to consider

• Since the Radancy acquisition, public pricing has disappeared and the product’s standalone roadmap is harder to read for small teams
• It’s video-first: resume screening isn’t documented in the screening module, and there are no validated personality or judgment assessments, so it shares Willo’s single-signal shape
• Knockout logic is limited to multiple-choice questions with a reject rule, so must-haves buried in a resume still need manual hunting
• Plan names show up in its help center, but no plan has a public price or published limits

Pricing

Contact sales pricing. Pricing was already quote-only by mid-2025, and the old myInterview pricing URL now ends in a 404 on Radancy’s site, so budget for a sales conversation.

Best for enterprise-scale hiring programs

HireVue

HireVue is the tool you graduate to when hiring stops being a workflow and becomes a program. It’s built for organizations hiring thousands of people a year across retail, hospitality, logistics, and corporate pipelines, and everything about it (assessment depth, ATS integration, implementation model) assumes that scale. It’s the lowest-rated tool on this list at 4.5/5 on Capterra from 50 reviews, which tracks with reviewer complaints about cost relative to the smaller, cheaper tools here.

Against Willo, it’s not really a like-for-like comparison. HireVue pairs one-way and live video with a mature library of game-based, cognitive, and coding assessments, and integrates deeply with Workday, SuccessFactors, and the other systems enterprises actually run. The full breakdown is in our HireVue pricing guide, but the short version is that the entry point sits far above everything else here.

Key features

• One-way and live video interviewing built for tens of thousands of candidates a year
• Game-based, cognitive, and coding assessments for skill signals beyond the recorded answer
• Candidate and interview data flow into Workday, Greenhouse, or SAP SuccessFactors without a manual export
• Interview scheduling and stage workflow for large distributed recruiting teams
• NLP-based candidate scoring, surfacing signals for your recruiters to weigh

What to consider

• No published pricing anywhere. Every deal is custom-quoted, so you can’t budget without a sales cycle
• Vendr’s marketplace data puts the median buyer at about $20,900/year (range roughly $9,800 to $41,000), and auto-renewal needs 60 days’ notice to opt out
• Implementation is a planned rollout with professional services, not an afternoon
• Assessments and AI scoring are typically priced as add-ons, so the starting quote rarely matches the final bill

Pricing

Contact sales pricing. HireVue doesn’t publish pricing. Vendr’s marketplace data puts the median buyer at about $20,900 a year (range roughly $9,800 to $41,000). Treat that as buyer-reported data, not a quote.

Which Willo alternative should you choose?

Start from the reason you’re leaving, not from the feature lists.

If you’re leaving because video alone isn’t enough signal, and you want resumes, one-way interviews, and assessments scored together in one shortlist, that’s Truffle. It’s the only tool on this list built around stacking all three, and at $49/month it’s also the cheapest way to get an analysis layer that isn’t gated by plan. If your real worry is fake candidates or fake job posts rather than signal depth, Willo’s own verification tools might solve that specific problem without you switching at all.

If you’re leaving because you want your video tool and ATS consolidated, Spark Hire is the strongest fit, as long as you total up the separate subscriptions before comparing prices.

If you’re leaving purely on price and your volume is low enough to review manually, Hireflix is the pick once you’re running more than one open role, since its flat $75/month (billed yearly) doesn’t move the way Willo’s per-role Lite plan does. You’re trading away analysis, knowingly, and its 256-review Capterra track record is the deepest on this list if that matters to you.

If you’re an enterprise with a complex, multi-stage process, the choice is between VidCruiter (workflow depth, strong support) and HireVue (raw scale and assessment breadth). Both mean sales cycles, implementations, and five-figure-plus budgets. Jobma sits just below them for global and technical hiring, and myInterview fits high-volume hourly hiring if the Radancy uncertainty doesn’t bother you.

Whatever you shortlist, run a live role through it before committing. Most of these tools offer a trial or demo, and an afternoon with real candidates tells you more than a week of review-site reading.

Frequently asked questions about Willo alternatives

How much does Willo cost?

Willo restructured its pricing in 2026, and the old Growth and Scale tiers are gone. There’s now a pay-as-you-go Lite plan at $59 per live role per month, capped at 5 concurrent roles, 5 users, and 150 assessed candidates per role. Above that, Enterprise is an annual contract starting around $3,799/year on a 1-year term (roughly $317/month) and dropping to about $3,229/year (roughly $269/month) on a 3-year commitment, with custom user and role limits. Lite includes summaries, benchmarking, and follow-up questions; transcription, Insights scoring, custom scorecards, custom branding, and anti-cheat are Enterprise-only. Running an actual ID check, right-to-work check, or background check costs extra either way, as an add-on on Lite and through credits on Enterprise.

Is Willo free?

No. Willo’s pricing page doesn’t mention a trial, though Willo’s own blog describes a 14-day free trial. The cheapest way in is the Lite plan at $59 per live role per month, pay-as-you-go with no annual contract. If you want a genuinely free way to test one-way video, Hireflix offers a one-month free trial. Truffle offers a 7-day free trial with 30 credits and no credit card, which covers a real test on a live role.

What is the difference between Willo and Spark Hire?

Willo is a focused one-way video tool: browser-based, simple, no annual contract on its Lite plan, strong on languages. Spark Hire is a broader platform with one-way and live video, scorecards, behavioral assessments, and a full ATS (Recruit), with 40+ native ATS integrations. Willo wins on simplicity and flexibility. Spark Hire wins on consolidation, at a higher and more fragmented price. Our full Willo vs Spark Hire comparison walks through both.

What is the best Willo alternative for a small business?

For an owner or ops lead running hiring on a small team, the honest answer depends on budget and how much signal you need. Hireflix is the cheapest like-for-like swap at $75/month flat on annual billing ($150 month to month) if you’ll review recordings yourself and you’re running more than one open role at a time. Truffle starts at $49/month and adds resume screening, assessments, and AI Match scores with the reasoning shown, so you get a ranked shortlist instead of watching every recording after hours. The enterprise tools on this list (VidCruiter, HireVue) are built for a different buyer entirely, one with a hiring team and an implementation budget you don’t have.

Does Willo do resume screening or assessments?

Not resume screening. Willo is built around collecting and reviewing one-way video, and resume screening happens in whatever other tool you run. It does include skills and role-based assessments, drawn from a library Willo says covers 1,500+ roles, but usage is capped on the Lite plan (150 assessed candidates per live role, across up to 5 roles), and validated personality or judgment assessments aren’t part of the product. That single-signal shape, deep on video, thin on everything else, is the main reason teams look at alternatives.

Does Willo verify candidate identity?

Not fully yet. Willo Verified, which confirms a candidate is who they claim to be, is listed on Willo’s pricing page as coming in the second half of 2026, on the Enterprise plan. A companion feature, Willo Proof, checks that the employer posting the role is legitimate. Both are aimed at the rise in fake job postings and fake applicants. Today you can buy an ID, right-to-work, or background check per candidate: as an add-on on Lite, through credits on Enterprise. It’s a useful feature if identity fraud is the specific problem you’re solving for, and it doesn’t replace screening for fit. Truffle focuses on fit: it scores resumes, interview answers, and assessments against your criteria so you can see why a real candidate ranked where they did.

Does AI decide who gets hired with any of these tools?

No, not with any tool on this list, and it’s worth being skeptical of one that claims otherwise. Willo’s AI (Transcribe, Summarize, Benchmark) organizes and analyzes responses. Jobma and HireVue score against rubrics and assessments. Truffle’s AI Match scores every candidate against the criteria you set and shows the reasoning behind each score. None of them picks a hire for you. Truffle’s AI never auto-rejects anyone; the only automatic rejection is a qualification rule you write and switch on yourself. Willo’s Benchmark works the same way, rejecting below a pass mark you set on multiple-choice questions. What they do is take a few hundred applicants and turn them into a ranked, evidence-backed shortlist faster than you could read them by hand. The decision, and the accountability that comes with it, stays with you.

How much does Truffle cost compared to Willo?

Truffle’s plans run from $49/month (Starter) to $599/month (Scale), plus a Custom tier, and every feature, including all three assessment types, is on every plan with no per-tier cap. Willo now starts at $59 per live role per month on its pay-as-you-go Lite plan, with AI summaries included (transcription and Insights scoring are Enterprise-only) but assessment usage capped at 150 per role and identity checks priced as add-ons; its Enterprise plan runs an annual contract starting around $3,799/year. The structural difference: Truffle is credit-based, with one shared pool spent across resume screening (1 credit), assessed candidates (2), and one-way interviews (5), and unused credits roll over on Core and up (capped at three months’ worth). Willo’s Lite plan charges per open role instead, so its cost moves with how many positions you’re running at once. You’re paying for screening you actually run either way, but Truffle’s pool doesn’t grow just because you opened a second role.

There’s a decent chance Willo is still the right tool for you, especially if multilingual one-way video or identity verification is genuinely all you need. But if you’ve read this far, you probably already know one signal isn’t cutting it. A recorded answer tells you how someone communicates. It doesn’t tell you if their experience checks out or how they’d handle a real judgment call on the job, and stacking a resume screen and an assessment on top is how you get both without adding separate tools.

Truffle’s one-way video interview software is built to sit next to resume screening and assessments in one workflow, not stand alone the way Willo’s does. Every feature, including all three assessment types, is included on every plan, and unused credits roll over on Core and up (capped at three months’ worth) so cost doesn’t creep up just because you opened a second role. Compare plans and credit costs on the pricing page, starting at $49/month, or start the 7-day free trial with 30 credits and no card to see the difference on a real role before you spend anything.