You're comparing video interviewing platforms, which means you're probably tired of scheduling phone screens that half your candidates don't show up for. Jobma and myInterview both promise to fix that problem by letting candidates record interview answers on their own time, but they take completely different approaches to getting you there.
Jobma offers enterprise-grade features like coding tests and custom scoring rubrics, while myInterview bets everything on AI automation and affordable monthly pricing. This comparison breaks down their features, pricing models, user experiences, and integration capabilities so you can figure out which platform actually fits your hiring process.
What is Jobma?
Jobma is one-way video interview software that lets companies screen job candidates through pre-recorded and live video interviews.
The platform launched in 2015 and now serves over 3,000 companies in more than 50 countries. Beyond basic video recording, Jobma uses AI to score candidate responses, transcribe interviews, and even generate interview questions based on job descriptions.
Here's what makes it different from a simple video call: Jobma can test coding skills for technical roles, let multiple interviewers evaluate the same candidate separately, and create custom scoring rubrics so everyone on your team rates candidates the same way.
What is myInterview?
myInterview takes a different approach to video screening. The platform centers around Taira, an AI assistant that handles interview scheduling, sends reminders to candidates, and analyzes their video responses before a human recruiter ever watches them.
Founded in 2016, myInterview focuses almost entirely on one-way video interviews. Candidates receive a link, record their answers to pre-set questions, and submit their responses without coordinating schedules with your team.
The AI doesn't just transcribe what candidates say. It evaluates how they communicate, analyzing speaking pace, word choice, and confidence levels to give recruiters a snapshot of each person's soft skills.
Feature comparison for Jobma and myInterview
Both platforms handle video interviews, but they've built different tools around that core function.
Video interview types
Jobma gives you three options: asynchronous interviews where candidates record on their schedule, live video calls for real-time conversations, and panel interviews where multiple team members join the same session. You might use one-way interviews to screen 50 applicants down to 10, then bring those finalists into live interviews.
myInterview built its entire platform around one-way interviews, though it added live interview features later. The real strength here is automation: Taira sends interview invitations, follows up with candidates who haven't responded, and reminds people when their deadline approaches.
AI and analytics capabilities
Jobma's AI scores candidates based on criteria you set, converts speech to text so you can search through interviews, and suggests interview questions when you describe a role. The platform also monitors candidates during coding tests, flagging suspicious behavior like switching browser tabs.
myInterview's Taira goes deeper into personality analysis. The AI looks at how candidates structure their thoughts, how quickly they speak, and which words they emphasize to build a profile of their communication style. This works well for customer service or sales roles where how someone says something matters as much as what they say.
Assessment and evaluation tools
Jobma includes coding tests and technical challenges, which makes sense for engineering roles. You can create custom scoring rubrics where different criteria carry different weights. For example, maybe communication counts for 30% of the score while technical accuracy counts for 50%.
myInterview skips technical testing and focuses on soft skills. The platform's visual dashboards let you compare how five candidates approached the same question, with AI highlighting patterns in their responses.
Branding and customization
Both platforms let you add your company logo and colors to the candidate experience. Jobma takes this further: You can customize email templates, create branded landing pages, and design unique evaluation forms for different roles.
myInterview offers simpler branding controls but provides pre-built question templates organized by industry. You'll get up and running faster, though you'll have less flexibility to match your exact hiring process.
Pricing and value comparison of Jobma and myInterview
Understanding what you'll actually pay requires looking past the advertised price.
Pricing transparency
myInterview does not publish its prices. Jobma also uses custom pricing based on your company size and hiring volume. This means you'll go through a sales process to learn the cost, though larger companies often negotiate better rates than published pricing would offer.
Free trial and onboarding
Jobma and myInterview typically schedule product demos instead of offering self-service trials. A sales rep walks you through the platform and answers questions, which takes more time but gives you personalized guidance.
Hidden costs and scalability
myInterview's monthly plans include a set number of interviews. Go over that limit and you'll pay overage fees; something to watch during busy hiring seasons when you might conduct 100 interviews in a month instead of your usual 30.
Jobma's contracts often lock you into annual commitments with negotiated interview volumes. If you hire 200 people a year consistently, you'll likely get better per-interview pricing than myInterview offers. But if your hiring fluctuates wildly, you might pay for interviews you never conduct.
User experience and platform performance
The candidate experience affects whether people actually complete your interviews.
Candidate experience
myInterview built its platform for mobile phones first. Candidates can record interviews from their smartphones without downloading apps, and completion rates typically hit 85% according to user reviews. The automated reminders help: Candidates get texts or emails before their deadline.
Jobma offers mobile apps for iOS and Android, though the desktop version feels more polished. Candidates can practice with sample questions before starting their real interview, which helps calm nerves and leads to better responses.
Recruiter interface and workflow
Jobma organizes candidates by job opening, interview stage, and custom tags you create. You can leave comments on specific moments in a video, like noting at the 2:30 mark that a candidate gave an excellent example, and share candidate profiles with hiring managers through secure links.
myInterview emphasizes speed. You can view two candidates side-by-side, comparing how they answered the same question. The AI generates summaries highlighting each person's strengths and concerns, though some users find the simplified interface limiting for complex hiring processes.
Technical reliability
Both platforms stay online consistently. Jobma users occasionally report video quality issues on slower internet connections, while myInterview users sometimes wait longer for AI analysis during peak hours when many companies are reviewing candidates simultaneously.
myInterview's mobile experience gets higher ratings for ease of use. Jobma's mobile apps pack in more features but take longer to learn.
Integrations and ecosystem
Video interviewing works best when it connects with your other HR tools.
ATS and HRIS integrations
Jobma connects directly with Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, and BambooHR. These integrations sync candidate data automatically—when someone completes an interview, their recording and scores appear in your applicant tracking system without manual data entry.
myInterview offers similar connections, with particularly strong integration with Bullhorn for staffing agencies. You can also send interview invitations directly from LinkedIn Recruiter.
Automation and workflow tools
Both platforms work with Zapier, opening up hundreds of automation possibilities:
- Automatic interview invitations: Trigger video interview requests when candidates reach a specific stage in your ATS
- Team notifications: Send Slack messages when candidates complete interviews
- CRM updates: Add high-scoring candidates to nurture campaigns
Jobma provides a REST API for custom integrations if your technical team wants to build something specific. myInterview limits API access to enterprise plans.
Communication tools
Here's where things get interesting. Both platforms send automated emails, but neither offers robust SMS capabilities. That's a gap worth noting—text messages get opened 98% of the time compared to email's 20% open rate.
Smart recruiting teams pair video interviewing with dedicated SMS tools. You might send interview reminders via text, follow up with candidates who haven't responded, and send status updates through their preferred channel. This multi-channel approach can boost interview completion rates by 30–40%.
Customer support and implementation for Jobma and myInterview
Support quality matters when you're trying to fill positions quickly.
Support channels and response times
Jobma offers email and phone support during business hours, with faster response times for enterprise customers. Users report average response times of 4–6 hours for standard questions and under 2 hours for urgent technical problems.
myInterview provides email support to everyone, with live chat available on higher-tier plans. Response times run a bit slower, 6–12 hours on average, though users praise the support team's helpfulness.
Training and resources
Both platforms maintain help centers with setup guides and troubleshooting articles. Jobma offers more video training, including separate tutorials for recruiters, hiring managers, and candidates.
myInterview's documentation focuses on quick starts like shorter guides with more screenshots and visual walkthroughs. The company also hosts monthly webinars on topics like reducing bias in video interviews.
Implementation timeline and complexity
myInterview's simpler feature set means faster setup. Most companies start conducting interviews within 1–2 weeks of signing up, thanks to pre-built question libraries and templates.
Jobma takes 3–4 weeks typically, including time for custom branding, evaluation rubric creation, and ATS integration setup. That longer timeline reflects the platform's flexibility but requires more upfront planning.
When to choose Jobma or myInterview
The right platform depends on what you're hiring for and how many people you're bringing on.
Best use cases for Jobma
Jobma works well for mid-sized to enterprise companies hiring for technical roles. If you're recruiting software engineers, data analysts, or IT specialists who need to prove their skills, Jobma's coding tests and technical assessments make sense.
Companies with complex hiring processes also benefit here. When multiple stakeholders evaluate candidates using different criteria, Jobma's custom rubrics and collaboration features keep everyone aligned.
Best use cases for myInterview
myInterview excels at high-volume hiring where speed matters more than customization. Retail stores hiring seasonal workers, call centers staffing up for busy periods, or sales teams bringing on new reps often find the AI-powered soft skill assessment valuable.
The transparent pricing and quick setup work well for small to mid-sized companies conducting video interviews for the first time. If you're hiring for roles where personality and communication style are primary considerations, myInterview's AI analysis provides useful early signals.
Company size and volume considerations
Companies conducting fewer than 50 interviews monthly often find myInterview's lower-tier plans more cost-effective. The per-month pricing aligns with variable hiring needs.
Organizations hiring 100+ candidates monthly typically get better value from Jobma's enterprise pricing, especially when factoring in technical assessment tools. The break-even point varies, but higher volume generally favors Jobma's pricing structure.
Alternatives to consider for Jobma and myInterview
A few other platforms might fit your specific situation better.
Truffle
Truffle is an AI-native one-way video interview platform built for SMBs and lean teams. It automates screening with AI Match %, skim-ready Candidate Summaries, and a 30-second Candidate Shorts highlight reel to get you from hundreds of applicants to your best matches fast. Setup takes minutes, invites go out via a single link, and pricing starts at $99/month with unlimited team members; ideal if you want fast, low-friction screening without adopting a full ATS.
HireVue
HireVue targets enterprise organizations with advanced AI and game-based assessments. The platform's predictive analytics claim to identify top performers based on thousands of data points, though this sophistication comes with significantly higher costs—typically $10,000+ annually.
Spark Hire
Spark Hire offers unlimited interviews on all plans, making it attractive for unpredictable hiring volumes. Pricing starts around $149 per month and includes both one-way and live video interviews, though AI capabilities lag behind Jobma and myInterview.
VidCruiter
VidCruiter provides strong security features and compliance tools, making it popular with government agencies and regulated industries. The platform bundles video interviewing with automated reference checking and skills testing.
Final verdict and recommendations
Neither platform wins across the board; the right choice depends entirely on your situation.
Choose myInterview if you're a small to mid-sized company looking for affordable, easy-to-implement screening. The AI assistant and transparent pricing work well for teams new to video interviewing or hiring primarily for customer-facing roles where soft skills matter most.
Choose Jobma if you're a larger organization with complex hiring needs, particularly for technical roles. The customization options, panel interview capabilities, and detailed analytics justify the higher cost and longer setup when you're making dozens of hires monthly.
For companies between these scenarios, consider running pilots with both platforms before committing. Most video interviewing tools offer demos or short trials that let you test the candidate experience.
