Hiring teams often rely on candidate screening software to evaluate candidates before moving forward in the interview process. Glider AI is one of the tools used for this purpose, especially in technical hiring. It helps teams assess skills through automated tests and structured evaluations.
By 2025, the hiring technology landscape has expanded to include many alternatives to Glider AI. These platforms offer different features, pricing, and types of assessments. Some are built specifically for software engineering roles, while others support a broader range of skills.
This article outlines a clear list of Glider AI alternatives, comparing their capabilities, ideal use cases, and how they align with modern hiring needs.
Why consider different platforms to Glider AI for hiring
Glider AI is a candidate assessment software designed for technical skills assessment. It's used by hiring teams to evaluate candidates for roles that require coding, software development, or other technical competencies. The platform includes automated tests, live interview tools, and AI-based evaluations.
Organizations look for alternatives for several practical reasons:
- Limited assessment types: Some teams need more diverse testing options than Glider AI offers
- Budget constraints: Pricing structures may not align with smaller team budgets
- User experience issues: Interfaces might be challenging for candidates or hiring teams
- Integration needs: Some organizations require better connections with their existing systems
For example, a company hiring developers may want a platform with more language-specific coding tests. A startup might need a more affordable option that still offers reliable technical screening.
Different hiring goals require different tools. A small business hiring its first engineer will have different needs than an enterprise adding hundreds of developers annually.
Key factors to evaluate in a Glider AI alternative
When comparing platforms, focus on these essential features that impact hiring results:
- Assessment capabilities: Look at the types of tests available (coding challenges, multiple-choice questions, project simulations) and how well they match your hiring needs
- Integration options: Check if the platform connects with your applicant tracking system (ATS) and other HR software
- Candidate experience: Consider how user-friendly the platform is for applicants, as this affects completion rates
- Pricing structure: Evaluate whether the cost model (subscription, per-assessment, or per-user) works for your hiring volume
- Reporting & analytics: Examine how results are presented and whether they provide actionable insights
The best coding assessment platform for your team depends on what you're trying to accomplish. Some tools excel at high-volume screening, while others offer deeper technical evaluation.
Eight leading Glider AI alternatives
Here are eight platforms that offer strong alternatives to Glider AI in 2026:
1. HackerRank
HackerRank is a developer skills platform that focuses on technical assessment. It offers coding challenges in over 35 programming languages and includes real-time interview features.
The platform is popular with large tech companies that hire many engineers. Its strengths include a large problem library and customizable coding tests.
HackerRank works best for organizations that need to evaluate specific programming skills and want detailed performance metrics.
2. Codility
Codility provides technical assessment tools with an emphasis on real-world coding tasks. Its CodeLive feature allows interviewers to collaborate with candidates in real time.
The platform includes plagiarism detection and supports multiple programming languages. It's designed for engineering teams that want to evaluate practical coding ability.
Codility stands out for its focus on measuring how candidates solve problems rather than just testing theoretical knowledge.
3. CodeSignal
CodeSignal offers standardized technical assessments including its General Coding Assessment (GCA). This platform includes proctoring features and skills certification.
It's particularly useful for campus recruiting and high-volume hiring. The platform provides consistent evaluation metrics that help compare candidates fairly.
CodeSignal differs from Glider AI by offering standardized assessment frameworks and consistent scoring models designed to compare candidates fairly.
4. TestGorilla
TestGorilla provides a library of over 300 tests covering both technical and non-technical skills. The platform includes anti-cheating measures and supports multiple assessment types.
It works well for companies hiring across different departments. TestGorilla tests cover programming, language proficiency, personality traits, and job-specific skills.
Unlike Glider AI, TestGorilla offers a broader range of assessment options beyond just technical skills testing.
5. DevSkiller
DevSkiller uses what it calls "RealLifeTesting" to evaluate candidates on practical tasks. The platform focuses on creating realistic coding scenarios rather than abstract problems.
It's designed for IT hiring teams that want to see how candidates handle actual job tasks. DevSkiller supports multiple programming languages and frameworks.
The platform differs from Glider AI by emphasizing practical application over theoretical knowledge testing.
6. Mercer Mettl
Mercer Mettl offers a comprehensive assessment platform with technical, cognitive, and personality tests. It includes AI-assisted proctoring and customizable assessment options.
The platform works well for large organizations with diverse hiring needs. It supports multiple assessment types and provides detailed analytics.
Mercer Mettl stands out for its enterprise features and broader assessment capabilities compared to Glider AI.
7. Vervoe
Vervoe focuses on skills-based hiring through job simulations and AI screening. The platform creates realistic work scenarios to evaluate how candidates perform tasks.
It supports both technical and non-technical roles with customizable assessment workflows. Vervoe uses AI to grade responses and rank candidates.
Unlike Glider AI, Vervoe emphasizes job simulation over standardized testing.
8. Truffle
Truffle is an AI-assisted screening platform that combines async video interviews, AI-resistant assessments, and AI-powered candidate summaries to help you screen every applicant without phone-screening all of them.designed for talent acquisition teams and hiring managers at growing companies. The platform helps you quickly build ranked shortlists using AI candidate summaries and match analysis—especially valuable when managing high-volume applications across multiple roles.
It's designed for recruiting teams managing 50+ applications per role who need to identify strong candidates quickly without spending hours on initial phone screens.
Truffle provides AI candidate summaries, match scores with reasoning, and Candidate Shorts (30-second video highlights) based on async video responses and three AI-resistant assessments: Personality (IPIP-validated), Situational Judgment (measures approach to realistic scenarios), and Environment Fit (surfaces work preference alignment).
At $149/month (or $99/month paid annually) with quick setup, Truffle focuses on conversation-based evaluation and AI-resistant assessments (measuring what AI can't fake—personality tendencies, situational approach, work preferences)—unlike technical skills platforms that candidates can now pass using AI tools.
How these alternatives compare to Glider AI
When comparing these platforms to Glider AI, several key differences emerge:
User experience
- Some alternatives offer simpler interfaces for both candidates and hiring teams
- Platforms like Truffle and TestGorilla focus on reducing friction in the assessment process
- Mobile compatibility varies across platforms, with some offering better on-the-go access
Assessment types
- Glider AI focuses primarily on technical assessment
- Alternatives like TestGorilla and Mercer Mettl include soft skills and personality evaluations
- Platforms like DevSkiller and Vervoe emphasize job simulation over standardized testing
Pricing approaches
- Most alternatives offer tiered pricing based on features and volume
- Some platforms charge per assessment while others use subscription models
- Enterprise pricing typically includes customization options and dedicated support
Integration capabilities
- Most alternatives connect with popular applicant tracking systems
- Integration depth varies, with some offering more automated workflows
- Data portability differs across platforms, affecting how easily information moves between systems
Different platforms excel in specific situations. For technical roles, HackerRank and Codility offer deep coding assessment. For broader hiring needs, TestGorilla and Mercer Mettl provide more diverse testing options.
Choosing the right platform for your needs
The best platform for your organization depends on your specific requirements:
For small businesses:
- Look for platforms with flexible pricing that scales with your hiring volume
- Focus on ease of use and quick implementation
- Consider platforms that don't require extensive configuration
For mid-sized companies:
- Balance feature depth with cost efficiency
- Prioritize good ATS integration to streamline workflows
- Look for platforms that support both technical and non-technical assessment
For enterprises:
- Evaluate security features and compliance capabilities
- Consider platforms with customizable workflows and reporting
- Look for robust analytics to support data-driven hiring decisions
When implementing a new assessment platform, plan for integration with existing systems, team training, and candidate communication. Most platforms offer support resources to help with setup.
For teams looking to screen every applicant without phone-screening all of them, Truffle offers an AI-assisted screening platform that surfaces who's worth talking to—fast.
FAQs about Glider AI alternatives
What types of skills can these platforms assess?
Most platforms assess technical skills like coding and problem-solving, while some also evaluate soft skills, cognitive abilities, and personality traits. The assessment range varies by platform, with some specializing in specific areas.
How much do Glider AI alternatives typically cost?
Pricing varies widely, from around $100 per month for basic plans to several thousand dollars monthly for enterprise solutions. Most platforms offer tiered pricing based on features, assessment volume, and user counts.
Can these platforms prevent cheating during assessments?
Many platforms include anti-cheating features such as browser lockdown, IP tracking, keystroke analysis, and AI-based proctoring. The effectiveness varies, with enterprise solutions typically offering more robust security measures.
How long does implementation typically take?
Implementation timeframes range from a few days for simple platforms to several weeks for enterprise solutions with complex integrations. Most providers offer implementation support and training resources to speed up the process.
Do these platforms work for non-technical hiring?
Several alternatives like TestGorilla, Mercer Mettl, and Vervoe support non-technical hiring with assessments for communication skills, problem-solving, and role-specific knowledge. These platforms offer more versatility than purely technical assessment tools.
The TL;DR
Hiring teams often rely on candidate screening software to evaluate candidates before moving forward in the interview process. Glider AI is one of the tools used for this purpose, especially in technical hiring. It helps teams assess skills through automated tests and structured evaluations.
By 2025, the hiring technology landscape has expanded to include many alternatives to Glider AI. These platforms offer different features, pricing, and types of assessments. Some are built specifically for software engineering roles, while others support a broader range of skills.
This article outlines a clear list of Glider AI alternatives, comparing their capabilities, ideal use cases, and how they align with modern hiring needs.
Why consider different platforms to Glider AI for hiring
Glider AI is a candidate assessment software designed for technical skills assessment. It's used by hiring teams to evaluate candidates for roles that require coding, software development, or other technical competencies. The platform includes automated tests, live interview tools, and AI-based evaluations.
Organizations look for alternatives for several practical reasons:
- Limited assessment types: Some teams need more diverse testing options than Glider AI offers
- Budget constraints: Pricing structures may not align with smaller team budgets
- User experience issues: Interfaces might be challenging for candidates or hiring teams
- Integration needs: Some organizations require better connections with their existing systems
For example, a company hiring developers may want a platform with more language-specific coding tests. A startup might need a more affordable option that still offers reliable technical screening.
Different hiring goals require different tools. A small business hiring its first engineer will have different needs than an enterprise adding hundreds of developers annually.
Key factors to evaluate in a Glider AI alternative
When comparing platforms, focus on these essential features that impact hiring results:
- Assessment capabilities: Look at the types of tests available (coding challenges, multiple-choice questions, project simulations) and how well they match your hiring needs
- Integration options: Check if the platform connects with your applicant tracking system (ATS) and other HR software
- Candidate experience: Consider how user-friendly the platform is for applicants, as this affects completion rates
- Pricing structure: Evaluate whether the cost model (subscription, per-assessment, or per-user) works for your hiring volume
- Reporting & analytics: Examine how results are presented and whether they provide actionable insights
The best coding assessment platform for your team depends on what you're trying to accomplish. Some tools excel at high-volume screening, while others offer deeper technical evaluation.
Eight leading Glider AI alternatives
Here are eight platforms that offer strong alternatives to Glider AI in 2026:
1. HackerRank
HackerRank is a developer skills platform that focuses on technical assessment. It offers coding challenges in over 35 programming languages and includes real-time interview features.
The platform is popular with large tech companies that hire many engineers. Its strengths include a large problem library and customizable coding tests.
HackerRank works best for organizations that need to evaluate specific programming skills and want detailed performance metrics.
2. Codility
Codility provides technical assessment tools with an emphasis on real-world coding tasks. Its CodeLive feature allows interviewers to collaborate with candidates in real time.
The platform includes plagiarism detection and supports multiple programming languages. It's designed for engineering teams that want to evaluate practical coding ability.
Codility stands out for its focus on measuring how candidates solve problems rather than just testing theoretical knowledge.
3. CodeSignal
CodeSignal offers standardized technical assessments including its General Coding Assessment (GCA). This platform includes proctoring features and skills certification.
It's particularly useful for campus recruiting and high-volume hiring. The platform provides consistent evaluation metrics that help compare candidates fairly.
CodeSignal differs from Glider AI by offering standardized assessment frameworks and consistent scoring models designed to compare candidates fairly.
4. TestGorilla
TestGorilla provides a library of over 300 tests covering both technical and non-technical skills. The platform includes anti-cheating measures and supports multiple assessment types.
It works well for companies hiring across different departments. TestGorilla tests cover programming, language proficiency, personality traits, and job-specific skills.
Unlike Glider AI, TestGorilla offers a broader range of assessment options beyond just technical skills testing.
5. DevSkiller
DevSkiller uses what it calls "RealLifeTesting" to evaluate candidates on practical tasks. The platform focuses on creating realistic coding scenarios rather than abstract problems.
It's designed for IT hiring teams that want to see how candidates handle actual job tasks. DevSkiller supports multiple programming languages and frameworks.
The platform differs from Glider AI by emphasizing practical application over theoretical knowledge testing.
6. Mercer Mettl
Mercer Mettl offers a comprehensive assessment platform with technical, cognitive, and personality tests. It includes AI-assisted proctoring and customizable assessment options.
The platform works well for large organizations with diverse hiring needs. It supports multiple assessment types and provides detailed analytics.
Mercer Mettl stands out for its enterprise features and broader assessment capabilities compared to Glider AI.
7. Vervoe
Vervoe focuses on skills-based hiring through job simulations and AI screening. The platform creates realistic work scenarios to evaluate how candidates perform tasks.
It supports both technical and non-technical roles with customizable assessment workflows. Vervoe uses AI to grade responses and rank candidates.
Unlike Glider AI, Vervoe emphasizes job simulation over standardized testing.
8. Truffle
Truffle is an AI-assisted screening platform that combines async video interviews, AI-resistant assessments, and AI-powered candidate summaries to help you screen every applicant without phone-screening all of them.designed for talent acquisition teams and hiring managers at growing companies. The platform helps you quickly build ranked shortlists using AI candidate summaries and match analysis—especially valuable when managing high-volume applications across multiple roles.
It's designed for recruiting teams managing 50+ applications per role who need to identify strong candidates quickly without spending hours on initial phone screens.
Truffle provides AI candidate summaries, match scores with reasoning, and Candidate Shorts (30-second video highlights) based on async video responses and three AI-resistant assessments: Personality (IPIP-validated), Situational Judgment (measures approach to realistic scenarios), and Environment Fit (surfaces work preference alignment).
At $149/month (or $99/month paid annually) with quick setup, Truffle focuses on conversation-based evaluation and AI-resistant assessments (measuring what AI can't fake—personality tendencies, situational approach, work preferences)—unlike technical skills platforms that candidates can now pass using AI tools.
How these alternatives compare to Glider AI
When comparing these platforms to Glider AI, several key differences emerge:
User experience
- Some alternatives offer simpler interfaces for both candidates and hiring teams
- Platforms like Truffle and TestGorilla focus on reducing friction in the assessment process
- Mobile compatibility varies across platforms, with some offering better on-the-go access
Assessment types
- Glider AI focuses primarily on technical assessment
- Alternatives like TestGorilla and Mercer Mettl include soft skills and personality evaluations
- Platforms like DevSkiller and Vervoe emphasize job simulation over standardized testing
Pricing approaches
- Most alternatives offer tiered pricing based on features and volume
- Some platforms charge per assessment while others use subscription models
- Enterprise pricing typically includes customization options and dedicated support
Integration capabilities
- Most alternatives connect with popular applicant tracking systems
- Integration depth varies, with some offering more automated workflows
- Data portability differs across platforms, affecting how easily information moves between systems
Different platforms excel in specific situations. For technical roles, HackerRank and Codility offer deep coding assessment. For broader hiring needs, TestGorilla and Mercer Mettl provide more diverse testing options.
Choosing the right platform for your needs
The best platform for your organization depends on your specific requirements:
For small businesses:
- Look for platforms with flexible pricing that scales with your hiring volume
- Focus on ease of use and quick implementation
- Consider platforms that don't require extensive configuration
For mid-sized companies:
- Balance feature depth with cost efficiency
- Prioritize good ATS integration to streamline workflows
- Look for platforms that support both technical and non-technical assessment
For enterprises:
- Evaluate security features and compliance capabilities
- Consider platforms with customizable workflows and reporting
- Look for robust analytics to support data-driven hiring decisions
When implementing a new assessment platform, plan for integration with existing systems, team training, and candidate communication. Most platforms offer support resources to help with setup.
For teams looking to screen every applicant without phone-screening all of them, Truffle offers an AI-assisted screening platform that surfaces who's worth talking to—fast.
FAQs about Glider AI alternatives
What types of skills can these platforms assess?
Most platforms assess technical skills like coding and problem-solving, while some also evaluate soft skills, cognitive abilities, and personality traits. The assessment range varies by platform, with some specializing in specific areas.
How much do Glider AI alternatives typically cost?
Pricing varies widely, from around $100 per month for basic plans to several thousand dollars monthly for enterprise solutions. Most platforms offer tiered pricing based on features, assessment volume, and user counts.
Can these platforms prevent cheating during assessments?
Many platforms include anti-cheating features such as browser lockdown, IP tracking, keystroke analysis, and AI-based proctoring. The effectiveness varies, with enterprise solutions typically offering more robust security measures.
How long does implementation typically take?
Implementation timeframes range from a few days for simple platforms to several weeks for enterprise solutions with complex integrations. Most providers offer implementation support and training resources to speed up the process.
Do these platforms work for non-technical hiring?
Several alternatives like TestGorilla, Mercer Mettl, and Vervoe support non-technical hiring with assessments for communication skills, problem-solving, and role-specific knowledge. These platforms offer more versatility than purely technical assessment tools.
Try Truffle instead.
